Coming up
- Friday 10/11: background for debate, midterm guide available
 - Monday 10/14: debate
 - Wednesday 10/16: review for midterm
 - Friday 10/18: midterm
 - Monday 10/21: Module 4, using animals for food, research, etc.
 - Friday 10/25: first field trip discussion (vegan restaurants, whole foods)
 - Monday 11/13: Module 5, wild animals
 
Field trips 
_________________________
Putting animals in political categories
_________________________
Animal citizens--first class members of our community
Which animals?  All the domesticated animals--dogs cats, farm animals (there will be vastly fewer farm animals)
Why are they citizens?
- We brought them here, we made them dependent on us, they can't live separately
 - Domesticated animals are capable of cooperation and interaction
 - If it was wrong to make dogs and cats dependent, should we just set them free or let them go extinct? (Gary Francione--we will discuss in module 4)
 
_________________________
Rights
- No voting for animals, no passports
 - "Equal protection of the law (and hence criminalization of harms to them)"
 - Emergency services (rescue from fire, floods)
 - They should "benefit from public spending (e.g.health care)"
 - Should "have their "interests weighed in the design of public space and institutions" (e.g. dog parks, "relief" facilities at airports)
 - Should have access to public spaces
 
- restaurants? (Paris, below)
 - animal cafes? (South Korea)
 - cats of istanbul
 - cows of India
 

Possible debate topic: Should pets in the US have more access to public space, as in other countries?
- Next time: background about access to public space in other countries plus other relevant issues
 
Responsibilities of animal citizens
- They should be socialized to live in a mixed community--no "jumping, biting, barking, defecating" (p. 6)
 - They should do non-exploitative work
 
- contribute manure YES
 - goats mowing lawn YES
 - sheep for wool if shorn humanely YES
 - keeping chickens for eggs MAYBE
 - using animals as guide dogs (video clip) NO
 
Wild animal sovereigns
- Don't exist because of us, competent to take care of themselves
 - Overlapping borders--some wild animal sovereigns are inside the US
 - Wild sovereigns have the basic rights all animals have – so no hunting, trapping
 - Not citizens or denizens
 - no right to be rescued after a disaster
 - no right to be in our public spaces (polar bear jail in Churchill, Canada)
 - We should respect their sovereignty, competence
 - should avoid invading habitat, but when you do take away habitat, create wildlife corridors
 - shouldn't alter their way of life even if it seems protective
 - one-off assistance ok
 
Module 5: wild animals in wilderness. We will discuss this and other views on how to treat wildlife.
_________________________
Liminal animal denizens
- Two principles that apply to human denizens (p. 14)
 - Principle #1: legit to have borders and laws about who enters; also legit to discourage entry
 - Principle #2: "sooner or later they acquire the right to stay" (p. 14)
 - Application to aiminal animal denizens
 - Principle #1: we can try to keep them out
 - Principle #2: "we need to regularize their status, and to accept and accommodate to their presence" (p. 14)
 - Example of mice
 - try to keep out: plug holes in walls to keep mice out, avoid open food, use humane traps and remove
 - accept and accommodate: what's wrong with a few in the cellar or garage or garden shed?
 
_________________________
Debate topics 
Possible debate question: Are all animals equal or do they fall into importantly different political categories, as D&K say?
Possible debate question: Should pets in the US have more access to public space, as in other countries?


